Book reviews

(I've started moving my older book reviews to the new web site. Some of them are not complete, and the internal links don't work.  I hope to fix this in the weeks to come.)

Why this page exists

I've often thought that many of the books i've read were unlikely to be picked up by most Christians. The reasons for this vary, but include the theological or spiritual disposition of the individual Christian, the title, author, or even the cover of the book in question. This page is an attempt to encourage Christians firstly to read more widely, and to consider theological positions and traditions other than the one they were raised/taught in. A secondary purpose for this list is to encourage me to be more analytical about my reading, and find an articulate expression for my feelings about particular books.

Disclaimer

Most of the books reviewed here are exegetical/theological in nature — my main emphasis in most theological issues is that exegesis comes before everything else.  Nearly all of the books that i recommend have a solid basis in Scripture.  Authors who allow their theological grid to limit their options with respect to interpretation of Scripture passages tend not to rate highly in my book.  Good authors recognise their theological grid and attempt to compensate for it.  This is a large part of the reason for this section - i need to recognise and compensate for my theological grid as well.  Anyway, i hope you find something that benefits you.

Book review: Hermeneutics, Authority and Canon

This book is comprised of a series of technical essays on various aspects of the doctrine of Scripture.  It is written from an Evangelical perspective, and is the second in a pair of volumes on Scripture edited by Carson and Woodbridge (the first being Scripture and Truth).  The primary focus of the book is on providing a reasoned presentation of the Evangelical view of Scripture in the face of liberal thought on the one hand, and fundamentalism on the other.

Outline of the book

Each chapter of Hermeneutics, Authority and Canon is a separate article in its own right.  Each addresses a different topic, and although there is considerable cross-pollination of ideas between articles (both within this book and with its companion volume), each can be understood without reference to the others.  Each article is around 40 pages in length, and so is able to cover the material in some depth.

...

Book review: The Canon of Scripture

Outline of the book

The Canon of Scripture is a well-structured book which deals with historical and theological issues relating to canonicity in a logical manner.  As he notes in the introduction, Bruce places more emphasis on the New Testament than the Old, mainly because his area of specialty is the New Testament, but also because the issues relating to the New Testament canon are more complex, and perhaps more debatable (primarily due to the larger amount of relevant data available). In part two, Bruce tackles issues relating to Old Testament canonicity, including the canon used by Jesus and the apostles, and the reason for and results of the supremacy of the Greek Old Testament (in various versions) in the early church.

Book review: Is the New Testament History?

In this book Paul Barnett ably demonstrates, by means of historical enquiry, that the claims of the New Testament are possible, likely, and indeed, the only reasonable explanation of first century church history. Barnett begins his examination with historical writings from outside the New Testament, such as those of Pliny the Younger, Tacitus, and Josephus.  He demonstrates how these people's accounts corroborate the biblical data about Jesus.  Then, after a brief review of the pertinent issues of textual criticism, he moves on to examine the biblical accounts in more detail (see the contents above).

Book review: How We Got Our Bible

This little gem came to me via the Lifeline Bookfest earlier this year.  For some reason books from around the turn of the 20th century hold a fascination for me, and this one has some unique material to offer.  It is well worth the read. Diagram showing how we got our Bible

Outline of the book

Smyth proceeds fairly steadily from the introduction of the issues that he is going to cover, explaining a few key issues and terms like textual criticism, to the explanation of manuscripts, versions, and quotations in the church fathers.  Brief overviews of the major manuscripts of interest are given in the chapter on Greek manuscripts, including codices Aleph (with a lengthy retelling of its discovery by Tischendorf), A, B, C, and D.  Chapter 3 gives an overview of versions and quotations from the fathers, with special emphasis on Jerome and the Vulgate.
Syndicate content